Fixing Foundations, Building Resilience, Developing Capacity : Ukrainian Recovery Planning as a Part of the Common European Project
Additional Files
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2025.01.000Keywords:
Ukraine, spatial planning, recovery, resilience, governance, reconstruction, EU integrationAbstract
Ukraine faces some of the most extreme conditions to have been experienced in Europe since the Second World War, including the loss of human life, depopulation, forced migration, the destruction of settlements, natural and agricultural areas, and the lack of access to basic services (e.g. water, electricity). These extreme conditions require huge, concerted efforts to promote the country’s recovery, as was also the case in Europe in the second half of the 1940s, when countries were rebuilt after being ravaged by war. At that time, new planning practices were developed in many countries in parallel with the establishment of new arrangements of the welfare state, including public housing, education and healthcare provision, on a scale unimaginable just one or two decades earlier. While Ukraine’s recovery and reconstruction have been discussed at length, little attention has so far been devoted to the implications for the role of spatial planning in the rebuilding process (with some minor exceptions: Maruniak et al., 2022; UN-Habitat Urban Recovery Framework Thematic Papers, forthcoming). The spatial dimension has largely been absent in political and expert debates, as though geography and the built
environment hardly matter, which is certainly not the case. Less than five years ago, pre-war territorial and administrative reforms reshaped the governance and land ownership landscape in Ukraine (Anisimov et al., 2024; Umland and Romanova, 2024). While these shifts have created new opportunities for locally led economic growth, they have also presented new problems and challenges for regional development, nature conservation, and land degradation (Anisimov et al., 2025). These reforms have also increased the dynamism of governance and land management. Understanding the spatial governance context is highly important for the EU and its member states, as Ukraine’s accession to the EU is likely to pose new challenges in the implementation of directives and regulations with direct impact on land.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Oleksandr Anisimov, Dominic Stead

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anisimov, O., Fedoriv, P., Tkachenko, O., Lawson, J., & Buitelaar, E. (2023). Rebuilding a place to call home. Sharing knowledge for the recovery of Ukraine. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
Anisimov, O., Smirnova, M., & Dulko, I. (2024). Establishment of a New Planning System in Ukraine: Institutional Change Between Europeanization and Post-Socialist Path Dependence. Planning Theory and Practice, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2024.2414973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2024.2414973
Anisimov, O., Vlasenko, Y., Stead, D., & Smirnova, M. (2025). Caught Up Between War, Localism and EU Land Policy Regulations. Unravelling Local Land Use Decision-Making in Ukraine. European Journal of Spatial Development, 22(3), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16635072
Maruniak, E. O., Palekha, Y. M., & Kryshtop, T. V. (2022). Planning of spatial development in times of war and reconstruction: a vision for Ukraine. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 4, 13–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2022.04.013
Umland, A., & Romanova, V. (Eds.). (2024). Ukraine’s Decentralization: Challenges and Implications of the Local Governance Reform after the Euromaidan Revolution. Ibidem.
