The case of rethinking the city
Keywords:MOOC, urban planning education, global south
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) are becoming a popular educational tool in different disciplines. Urban planning education is no exception and new MOOCs are being released every year. Despite this, it is still not clear how this new learning experience is being developed, delivered, and impacting upon planning education. This article sheds light on this issue using the case of the Rethink the City MOOC organised by the Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment of TU Delft. The course received the AESOP Excellence on Teaching award in 2017 and serves as an example of how planning education is facing the change towards online education. The article briefly introduces the course and develops on the challenges and results of it. Based on the course team experience of preparing and delivering the course, the article contributes to the debate about online education and supports fellow academics involved with the creation of new MOOCs.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Frank, Andrea, Izabela Mironowicz, Julia Lourenco, Teresa Franchini, Peter Ache, Maros Finka, Bernd Scholl and Anita Grams (2014) Educating planners in Europe: A review of 21st century study programmes. Progress in Planning, 91, pp.30-94.
Graham, Marnie, Jessica McLean, Alexander Read, Sandie Suchet-Pearson and Venessa Viner (2017) Flipping and still learning: Experiences of a flipped classroom approach for a third-year undergraduate human geography course. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41 (3), pp.403-417.
GSSC (2015) Global South Studies Center Cologne, online http://gssc.uni-koeln.de/ [accessed on 05/10/2017].
Healey, Patsy (2012) The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. Planning Theory, 11 (2), pp.188-207.
Healey, Patsy (2013) Circuits of knowledge and techniques: The transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37 (5), pp.1510-1526.
Hew, Khe F. and Wing Sum Cheung (2014) Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12 (Supplement C), pp.45-58.
Home, Robert (2014) Shaping cities of the Global South: Legal histories of planning and colonialism. In Parnell, Susan and Sophie Oldfield (eds) The Routledge handbook on cities of the Global South. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.75-85.
Miraftab, Faranak (2016) Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the Global South. In Fainstein, Susan S. and James DeFilippis (eds) Readings in planning theory: Fourth edition. Wiley, Blackwell, pp.480-498.
Nelson, Jorge, Willem van Valkenburg and Sofia Dopper (2016) The TU Delft online learning experience: From theory to practice. In Teixeira, Antonio Moreira, Andras Szuc and lldiko Mazar (eds) Re-Imaging Learning Environments. Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network. Budapest, 14-17 June. ISBN 978-615-5511-10-3.
Kunzmann, Klaus R. and Liu Yuan (2014) Educating Planners from China in Europe. disP - The Planning Review, 50 (4), pp.66-70.
Kurucay, Murat and Fethi A. Inan (2017) Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115 (Supplement C), pp.20-37.
Pessoa, Igor M., Tuna Tasan-Kok and Willem K. Korthals Altes (2016) Brazilian urban porosity: treat or threat? Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning, 169 (2), pp.47-55.
Paasi, Anssi (2005) Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A, 37 (5), pp.769-789.
Ratnayake, Rangajeewa and Andrew Butt (2018) Encounters with the unfamiliar: International planning education. International Planning Studies, 23 (1), p.51-64.
Roy, Ananya (2011) Commentary: Placing planning in the world-transnationalism as practice and critique. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31 (4), pp.406-415.
Roy, Ananya (2016) Who’s afraid of postcolonial theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40 (1), pp.200-209.
Rosier, Johanna, Christine Slade, Tim Perkins, Claudia Baldwin, Eddo Coiacetto, Trevor Budge and Andrew Harwoodet (2016) The benefits of embedding experiential learning in the education of planners. Planning Practice & Research, 31 (5), pp.486-499.
Shapiro, Heather B., Clara H. Lee, Noelle E. Wyman Roth, Kun Li, Mine Çetinkaya-Rundel and Dorian A. Canelas (2017) Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers & Education, 110 (Supplement C), pp.35-50.
Siame, Gilbert (2016) The value and dynamics of community-based studio projects in planning education in the Global South. Berkeley Planning Journal, 28 (1), pp.40-67.
UN (2015) World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations, New York, https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Report.pdf [accessed 05/10/2017].
Vergara, Luz M., Vincent Gruis and Kees van der Flier (2019) Understanding housing management by low-income homeowners: Technical, organisational and sociocultural challenges in Chilean condominium housing. Buildings, 9, 65.
Watson, Vanessa (2016a) Seeing from the South: Refocusing urban planning on the Globe’s central urban issues. In Fainstein, Susan S. and James DeFilippis (eds) Readings in planning theory: Fourth edition. Wiley, Blackwell, pp.540-560.
Watson, Vanessa (2016b) Planning mono-culture or planning difference? Planning Theory and Practice, 17 (4), pp.663-67.