Human dignity

Is there a place for it in planning?





Human dignity, housing, poor doors controvers, social justice, spatial injustice, planning theory, ubuntu


Although human dignity has caught the attention of scholars in many different fields, planners remain unresponsive. Three reasons may be given for planners’ neglect of human dignity: (1)  so far, nobody has inspired planners to cherish human dignity as a planning value or goal; (2)  planners respect and protect human dignity, but do not use the term; (3)  planners distrust values that are not too complex for laypersons. Two cases illustrate the possible consequences of ‘planning for dignity’ – the case of the knitting ladies of Blikkiesdorp (Cape Town), and the poor door controversy of 2014. The most important conclusions are that planners, in order to align their plans with human dignity (or ubuntu), must co-produce their selves within local communities affected by their plans. Moreover, planners must recognize the tension that exists between social justice and human dignity: A plan that is socially just can still be humiliating.

How to Cite

Davy, B. (2020). Human dignity: Is there a place for it in planning?. Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 4(1), 7–21.





Abercrombie, Patrick (1959) Town and country planning. 3rd edition, revised by D. Rigby Childs. London – New York – Toronto: Oxford University Press.

Ackermann, Laurie (2012) Human dignity: Lodestar for equality in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta.

Ai Weiwei (2019) Human dignity is in danger. In 2019 we must stand as one to survive. The Guardian, 1 January, 2019 (; last visited 1 June 2020).

Aldridge, Gemma (2014) ‘Poor doors’ scandal: Separate entrances for wealthy and housing association tenants at apartment blocks. Mirror, 2 August, 2014 (; last accessed 1 June 2020).

Alexander, Gregory S. (2018) Property and human flourishing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Alexie, Sherman (2005) Dignity. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 3, pp.469-470.

Arpey, Connor (2017) The multifaceted manifestations of the poor door. Examining forms of separation in inclusionary housing. American University Business Law Review, 6 (3), pp.627-645.

Barak, Aharon (2015) Human dignity. The constitutional value and the constitutional right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Battis, Ulrich, Michael Krautzberger and Rolf-Peter Löhr (2016) BauGB – Baugesetzbuch. 13th edition. München: C.H. Beck.

Branson-Potts, Hailey (2014) West Hollywood commission votes against ‘poor door’ housing development. Los Angeles Times, 9 August, 2014 ( html; last accessed 1 June 2020).

Campbell, Heather (2002) Planning: An idea of value. Town Planning Review, 73 (3), pp.271-288.

Cornell, Drucilla and Karin van Marle (2005) Exploring ubuntu: Tentative reflections. African Human Rights Law Journal 5, pp.195-220.

Crawford, Colin (2011) The social function of property and the human capacity to flourish. Fordham Law Review, 80 (3), pp.1089-1134.

Davoudi, Simin (2016) The value of planning and the values in planning. Town Planning Review, 87 (6), pp.615-618.

Davoudi, Simin (2018) Imagination and spatial imaginaries: A conceptual framework. Town Planning Review, 89 (2), pp.97-107.

Davy, Benjamin (1997) Essential injustice. When legal institutions cannot resolve environmental and land use disputes. Wien – New York: Springer.

Davy, Benjamin (2014) Raumplanung und die Politik der Würde. In Blaas, Wolfgang, Johann Bröthaler, Michael Getzner and Gerlinde Gutheil-Knopp-Kirchwald (eds) Perspektiven der staatlichen Aufgabenerfüllung. Für Wilfried Schönbäck zum 70. Geburtstag. Wien: Verlag Österreich, pp.51-76.

Davy, Benjamin (2015) Human dignity and spatial justice. Presentation at the 2015 AESOP Congress in Prague. FLOOR Working Paper No. 31. WP031_B_Davy_Human_dignity_spatial_justice.pdf

Davy, Benjamin (2017) Human dignity and property in land – A human rights approach. In Pellissery, Sony, Benjamin Davy and Harvey Jacobs (eds) Land policies in India. Promises, practices and challenges. Springer Nature: Singapore, pp.1-33.

Davy, Benjamin (2019a) Non-humiliating plans: A human rights approach. In Haltaufderheide, Joschka, Ina Otte, Philipp Weber (eds) Raum und Würde. Bielefeld: transcript, pp.79-105.

Davy, Benjamin (2019b) Evil insurgency. Planning Theory and Practice, 20 (2), pp.290-297.

DeCelles, Katherine A. and Michael I. Norton (2016) Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, pp.5588-5591.

Düwell, Marcus, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword and Dietmar Mieth (eds) (2014) The Cambridge handbook of human dignity. Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eagle, Steven J. (2017) Land use regulation and good intentions. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 33 (1), pp.87-144.

Epstein, Richard E. (2018) Positive and negative externalities in real estate development. Minnesota Law Review, 102 (4), pp.1493-1526.

Fainstein, Susan S. (2010) The just city. Ithaca – London: Cornell University Press.

Ferreira, José Antunes, José Manuel Simões, Sofia Morgado, Eduarda Marques da Costa, João Cabral, Isabel Loupa Ramos, Jorge Batista e Silva, Miguel Baptista-Bastos (eds) (2017) Abstracts book of the 2017 AESOP Congress. Lisbon: Universidade de Lisboa (ISBN 978-989-99801-4-3).

Finley, Susan (2003) The faces of dignity: Rethinking the politics of homelessness and poverty in America. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16 (4), pp.509-531.

Fukuyama, Francis (2018) Identity. Contemporary identity politics and the struggle for recognition. London: Profile Books.

Gilroy, Rose (2008) Places that support human flourishing: Lessons from later life. Planning Theory & Practice, 9 (2), pp.145-163.

Iglesias, Tim (2015) Maximizing inclusionary zoning’s contributions to both affordable housing and residential integration. Washburn Law Journal, 54 (3), pp.585-612.

Ishiguro, Kazuo (1989) The remains of the day. London: Faber and Faber.

Kaika, Maria (2017) ‘Don’t call me resilient again!’: the New Urban Agenda as immunology ... or ... what happens when communities refuse to be vaccinated with ‘smart cities’ and indicators. Environment and Urbanization, 29 (1), pp.89-102.

Kasperkevic, Jana (2015) New York bans ‘poor doors’ in win for low income tenants. The Guardian, 29 June, 2015 (; last accessed 1 June 2020).

Kassens-Noor, Eva and John Lauermann (2017) How to bid better for the Olympics: A participatory mega-event planning strategy for local legacies. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83 (4), pp.335-345.

Lee, Jeff (2015) New Vancouver highrise to have separate door for social housing. Entrances for condo owners and social housing questioned as segregating the rich and poor. Vancouver Sun, 5 May, 2015 (; last accessed 1 June 2020).

Liebenberg, Sandra (2005) The value of human dignity in interpreting socio-economic rights. South African Journal on Human Rights, 21 (1), pp.1-31.

Mabovula, Nonceba Nolundi (2011) The erosion of African communal values: A reappraisal of the African Ubuntu philosophy. Inkanyiso, 3 (1), pp. 38–47.

Margalit, Avishai (1996) The decent society. Cambridge, MA – London: Harvard University Press.

Marshall, Thomas Humphrey (1950) Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McCrudden, Christopher (ed.) (2014) Understanding human dignity. Oxford: The British Academy / Oxford University Press.

Metz, Thaddeus (2011) Ubuntu as a moral theory and human rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 11 (2), pp.532-559.

Mokgoro, Yonne and Stu Woolman (2010) Where dignity ends and uBuntu begins: An amplification of, as well as an identification of a tension in, Drucilla Cornell’s thoughts. South African Public Law, 25 (2), pp.400-407.

Müller, Martin (2015) The mega-event syndrome: Why so much goes wrong in mega-event planning and what to do about it. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81 (1), pp.6-17.

Navarro, Mireya (2014) ‘Poor door’ in a New York tower opens a fight over affordable housing. The New York Times, 26 August, 2014 (; last accessed 1 June 2020).

Navarro, Mireya (2015) 88,000 applicants and counting for 55 units in ‘poor door’ building. The New York Times, 20 April, 2015 (; last accessed 1 June 2020).

Nickel, James W. (2005) Poverty and rights. The Philosophical Quarterly, 55 (July), pp.385-402.

Payne, Keith (2017) The broken ladder. How inequality changes the way we think, live and die. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Rider, Robert A. (2016) I am because we are. Tennessee Law Review, 83 (3), pp.813-823.

Riley, Stephen and Gerhard Bos (without year) Human dignity. In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (; last visited 1 June 2020).

Savini, Federico (2018) Responsibility, polity, value: The (un)changing norms of planning practice. Planning Theory, 18 (1), pp.58-81.

Schindler, Sarah B. (2015) Architectural exclusion: Discrimination and segregation through physical design of the built environment. Yale Law Journal, 124 (6), pp.1934-2025.

Sheffield, Jonathan J. (2015) Homeless bills of rights: Moving United States policy toward a human right to housing. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy, 22 (2), pp.321-354.

Söfker, Wilhelm and Peter Runkel (2017) Kommentar zu § 1 BauGB. In Werner, Ernst, Willy Zinkhahn, Walter Bielenberg and Michael Krautzberger (eds) Baugesetzbuch. Kommentar. Volume 1 (supplement no. 126). München: C.H. Beck.

Soja, Edward W. (2010) Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Speak, Suzanne (2012) Planning for the needs of urban poor in the Global South: The value of a feminist approach. Planning Theory, 11 (4), pp.343-360.

Stahl, Kenneth A. (2017) The challenge of inclusion. Temple Law Review, 89 (3), pp.487-534.

Steinberg, Johnny (2015) A man of good hope. London: Jonathan Cape.

Strauss, Margot and Sandra Liebenberg (2014) Contested spaces: Housing rights and eviction law in post-apartheid South Africa. Planning Theory, 13 (4), pp.428-448.

Thomas, Huw (ed.) (1994) Values and planning. Avebury: Aldershot et al.

Thomas, Huw (2012) Values and the planning school. Planning Theory, 11 (4), pp.400-417.

Upton, Robert (2002) Planning praxis. Ethics, values and theory. Town Planning Review, 73 (3), pp.253-269.

Waldron, Jeremy (1991) Homelessness and the issue of freedom. University of California at Los Angeles Law Review, 39 (1), pp.295-324.

Walker, Robert, Grace Bantebya Kyomuhendo, Elaine Chase, Sohail Choudry, Erika K. Gubrium, Jo Yongmie Nicola, Ivar Lødemel, Leemamol Mathew, Amon Mwiine, Sony Pellissery, Yan Ming (2013) Poverty in global perspective: Is shame a common denominator? Journal of Social Policy, 42 (2), pp.215-233.

Wirzbicki, Alan (2014) Allowing ‘poor door’ a better alternative. The Boston Globe, 26 July, 2014 (https://www.; last accessed 1 June 2020).

Withnall, Adam (2014) ‘Poor door’ controversy extends to Washington DC as affordable housing ‘wing’ given entrance on different street – next to the loading bay. The Independent, 4 August, 2014 (; last accessed 1 June 2020).

Wittlin, Lauren C. (2015) Access denied: The tale of two tenants and building amenities. Touro Law Review, 31 (3), pp.615-647.

Woo, Andrea (2015) Vancouver developer accused of using ‘poor door’ for low-income residents. The Globe and Mail, 5 May, 2015 (; last accessed 1 June 2020).