European spatial planning beyond sovereignty





By definition sovereign, States find themselves inescapably in a situation of permanent competition. Moreover, given that an inherent quality of sovereignty is to exclude obeying whomever else, nobody, neither individuals nor institutions can arbitrate between them. This being the case, in the international arena power becomes the one and only currency. It seems basic even to each State’s survival: in this endless competition, the sustainability of each depends on the capacity to maintain a sufficient level of power.

(Badie, 2018, p.44 translated by the author)

What is ... needed is reflecting on new ways of adapting politics and democracy to the unique and universal world of networks...

(Balligand and Maquart, 1990, p.219 translated by the author)


The above quotes relate to the ambivalence of its members towards the European Union construct. Wishing to remain sovereign, they simultaneously acknowledge that they have to adapt to a new world. So, they conclude treaties which give the Union specific powers. Unable to unilaterally give itself powers, or ‘competences’ in EU jargon, their Union is therefore ‘intergovernmental’. If it were able to assume powers on its own, it would be like a federal state. As such, the Union could exercise some degree of ‘territoriality’, or control over its borders. As it is, it cannot.

How to Cite

Faludi, A. (2020). European spatial planning beyond sovereignty. Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 4(2), 99–110.





Badie, Bertrand (2018) Quand le Sud réinvente le monde: Essai sur la puissance de la faiblesse. La Découverte, Paris. (Ebook)

Balibar, Etienne (2009) Europe as borderland. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, pp.190-215.

Balligand, Jean-Pierre and Daniel Maquart (1990) La fin du territoire jacobin. Albin Michel, Paris. (Ebook)

Elkins, David J. (1995) Beyond Sovereignty: Territory and Political Economy in the Twenty-First Century. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Buffalo, London.

European Commission (2010) Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Available at: (Last accessed December 7, 2019)

European Communities (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards a Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

European Communities (2001) European Governance: A White Paper, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

European Communities (2002) European Governance: Preparatory Work for the White Paper, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 279-325.

Faludi, Andreas (ed.) (2005) Territorial Cohesion: An Unidentified Political Objective? Town Planning Review, 76 (1), pp.1-118.

Faludi, Andreas (1996) European planning doctrine: A bridge too far? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16, pp.41-50.

Faludi, Andreas (ed.) (2007) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.

Faludi, Andreas (2010) PEACE in Odessa. In Kunzmann Klaus R., Willy A. Schmidt and Martina Kroll-Schretzenmayr (eds) China and Europe: The Implications for the Rise of China for European Space, Routledge, London, pp.219-238.

Faludi, Andreas (2013) Territory: An unknown quantity in debates on territorial cohesion. European Journal of Spatial Development, Nr 51. Available at:

Faludi, Andreas (2019) Au-delá du territorialism: la métaphore de l’archipel’. In Brunet, Sylvia, Lydia Lebon and Richard Yann (eds) Les dossiers des Annales de Droit, Prolifération des territoires et représentations territoriales de l’Union européenne. Presses Universitaires de Rouen et du Havre, Mont-Saint-Aignan, pp.161-174.

Faludi, Andreas (2020 [2018]) The poverty of territorialism: A neo-medieval view of Europe and European planning (Elgar Studies in Planning Theory, Policy and Practice). Edgar Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.

Faludi, Andreas and Arnold Van der Valk (1994) Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

Gatawis, Siegbert (2000) Grundfragen eines europäischen Raumordnungsrechts (Beiträge zur Raumplanung und zum Siedlungs- und Wohnungswesen, Bd. 196), Selbstverlag des Zentralinstituts für Raumplanung und des Instituts für Siedlungs- und Wohungswesen der Universität Münster, Münster.

Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri (2000) Empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, London.

Krastev, Ivan (2017) After Europe. Princeton University Press.

Rosanvallon, Pierre (1998) Le peuple introuvable. Gallimard, Paris.

Ross, George (1995) Jacques Delors and European integration. Polity Press, Cambridge.

Sack, Robert David (1986) Human territoriality: Its theory and history. Cambridge Studies in Historical Geography.

Thiesse, Anne-Marie (1999) La création des identités nationales. Édition Seuil, Paris.

Williams, Richard H. (1996) European Union spatial policy and planning. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Zetter, John (2002) Spatial planning in the European Union: A Vision of 2010. In Faludi, Andreas (ed.) European Spatial Planning. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, pp.179-191.

Zielonka, Jan (2014) Is the EU Doomed? Polity Press, Cambridge.

Zonneveld, Wil (2018) CRONWE: First attempts to institutionalize European spatial planning. Planning Perspectives, 33 (4), pp.523-542.