The impact of actor-relational dynamics on integrated planning practice





planning practice, organisational learning, strategic spatial planning, integrated planning, process memory


Integrated planning processes involve an increasing number of actors and aim to create synergy between multiple knowledges in communicative settings. Planning research has acknowledged that the actor-relational aspects of planning processes are not yet adequately understood, and that methods to reveal the often-invisible dynamics and their possible effects over time require development. This research aims at developing a methodological contribution for revealing the socio-communicative complexities of integrated planning processes, by focusing on the aspects of knowledge co-creation and process memory development. Actor-relational dynamics are explored through social network analysis and qualitative methods, using longitudinal data from a four-year strategic spatial planning process in the Finnish context. The findings indicate that a range of actor-relational dynamics affect the level of sectoral and scalar integration over time, and that social complexities have an essential role in enabling knowledge co-creation and process memory development. Unveiling actor-relational dynamics is a promising research direction, requiring new methods for bridging research and practice, and re-centring the need for understanding planning practice on the actor-relational level.

How to Cite

Eräranta, S., & Mladenović, M. N. (2021). The impact of actor-relational dynamics on integrated planning practice. Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 5(1), 9–22.







Argote, Linda (2013) Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI:

Argyris, Chris and Donald A. Schön (1978) Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Argyris, Chris and Donald A. Schön (1996) Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Batty, Michael (2005) Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bertolini, Luca (2017) Planning the mobile metropolis: Transport for people, places and the planet. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.

Boelens, Luuk (2010) Theorizing practice and practising theory: Outlines for an actor-relational-approach in planning. Planning Theory, 9 (1), pp.28-62. DOI:

Boelens, Luuk and Tom Coppens (2015) Actor-relational planning in deprived areas: Challenges and opportunities in Luchtbal Antwerpen, Belgium. Planning Practice & Research, 30 (4), pp.410-423. DOI:

Boonstra, Beitske (2015) Planning strategies in an age of active citizenship: A post-structuralist agenda for self-organization in spatial planning. InPlanning. Groningen.

Borgatti, Stephen P. (2005) Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27 (1), pp.55-71. DOI:

Borgatti, Stephen P. and Rob Cross (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49 (4), pp.432-445. DOI:

Brandes, Ulrik, Stephen P. Borgatti and Linton C. Freeman (2016) Maintaining the duality of closeness and betweenness centrality. Social Networks, 44, 153-159. DOI:

Campbell, Heather (2012) Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32 (2), pp.135-146. DOI:

Candel, Jeroen JL, and Robbert Biesbroek (2016) Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49 (3), pp.211-231. DOI:

Carey, Martha Ann and Jo-Ellen Asbury (2016) Focus group research. New York: Routledge. DOI:

Coughlan, Paul and David Coghlan (2011) Collaborative strategic improvement through network action learning: The path to sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI:

Cummings, Jonathon N. and Monica. C. Higgins (2006) Relational instability at the network core: Support dynamics in developmental networks. Social Networks, 28 (1), pp.38-55. DOI:

Curtis, Carey and Bruce James (2004) An institutional model for land use and transport integration. Urban Policy and Research, 22 (3), pp.277-297. DOI:

Davoudi, Simin (2015) Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory, 14 (3), pp.316-331. DOI:

Dempwolf, C. Scott and Ward Lyles (2012) The uses of social network analysis in planning: A review of the literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 27 (1), pp.3-21. DOI:

de Roo, Gert and Elisabete A. Silva (eds) (2010) A planner’s encounter with complexity. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Easterby-Smith, Mark and Marjorie A. Lyles (2011) In praise of organizational forgetting. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20 (3), pp.311-316. DOI:

Eräranta, Susa (2019) Memorize the dance in the shadows? Unriddling the networked dynamics of planning processes through social network analysis. Doctoral dissertation. Aalto University.

Eräranta, Susa (2020) Social complexities in collaborative planning processes. In de Roo, Gert, Claudia Yamu and Christian Zuidema (eds) Handbook on planning and complexity. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp.171-185. DOI:

Eräranta, Susa and Mladenović, Miloš N. (2021) Networked dynamics of knowledge integration in strategic spatial planning processes: A social network approach. Regional Studies, 55 (5), pp.870-882. DOI:

Fernandez, Vicenc and Albert Sune (2009) Organizational forgetting and its causes: An empirical research. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22 (6), pp.620-634. DOI:

Ferreira, António (2018) Towards an integrative perspective: Bringing Ken Wilber’s philosophy to planning theory and practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 19 (4), pp.558-577. DOI:

Fiol, C. Marlena and Marjorie A. Lyles (1985) Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10 (4), pp.803-813. DOI:

Freeman, Linton C. (1978) Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarifications. Social Networks, 1 (3), pp.215-239. DOI:

Granovetter, Mark S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), pp.1360-1380. DOI:

Healey, Patsy (1992) A planner’s day: Knowledge and action in communicative practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58 (1), pp.9-20. DOI:

Healey, Patsy (2006) Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge. DOI:

Holan, Pablo Martin de and Nelson Phillips (2004) Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Science, 50 (11), pp.1603-1613. DOI:

Holden, Meg (2012) Is integrated planning any more than the sum of its parts? Considerations for planning sustainable cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32 (3), pp.305-318. DOI:

Innes, Judith E. (2005) Networks and planning thought. In Albrechts, Louis and Seymour Mandelbaum (eds) The network society: A new context for planning. London: Routledge, pp.57-61.

Innes, Judith E. and David E. Booher (2010) Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London: Routledge.

Innes, Judith E. and David E. Booher (2015) A turning point for planning theory? Overcoming dividing discourses. Planning Theory, 14 (2), pp.195-213. DOI:

Kaiser, David Brian, Nadin Gaasch and Thomas Weith (2017) Co-Production of knowledge: A conceptual approach for integrative knowledge management in planning. Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 1 (1), pp.18-32. DOI:

Kidd, Sue (2007) Towards a framework of integration in spatial planning: An exploration from a health perspective. Planning Theory & Practice, 8 (2), pp.161-181. DOI:

Langley, Ann (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24 (4), pp.691-710. DOI:

Lehner, Franz and Ronald K. Maier (2000) How can organizational memory theories contribute to organizational memory systems? Information Systems Frontiers, 2 (3/4), pp.277-298. DOI:

Martin de Holan, Pablo (2011) Organizational forgetting, unlearning, and memory systems. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20 (3), pp.302-304. DOI:

McCulloh, Ian, Helen Armstrong and Anthony Johnson (2013) Social network analysis with applications. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.

Mladenović, Miloš N. and Susa Eräranta (2020) Hear the rime of the fellow mariner? A letter to the next generation of emphatic co-creators in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 21 (1), pp.164-174. DOI:

Moynihan, Donald P. and Noel Landuyt (2009) How do public organizations learn? Bridging cultural and structural perspectives. Public Administration Review, 69 (6), pp.1097-1105. DOI:

Mäntysalo, Raine, Alessandro Balducci and Jonna Kangasoja (2011) Planning as agonistic communication in a trading zone: Re-examining Lindblom’s partisan mutual adjustment. Planning Theory, 10 (3), pp.257-272. DOI:

Nonaka, Ikujiro and Hirotaka Takeuchi (1995) The Knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.

Oh, Hongseok, Myung-Ho Chung and Giuseppe Labianca (2004) Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6), pp.860-875. DOI:

Olivera, Fernando (2000) Memory systems in organizations: An empirical investigation of mechanisms for knowledge collection, storage and access. Journal of Management Studies, 37 (6), pp.811-832. DOI:

Pettigrew, Andrew M. (1997) What is a processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13 (4), pp.337-348. DOI:

Phelps, Corey, Ralph Heidl and Anu Wadhwa (2012) Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38 (4), pp.1115-1166. DOI:

Portugali, Juval (2012) Self-organization and the city. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

Prahalad, Coimbatore K. and Gary Hamel (2000) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68 (3), pp.3-22. DOI:

Puustinen, Sari, Raine Mäntysalo, Jonne Hytönen and Karoliina Jarenko (2017) The “deliberative bureaucrat”: Deliberative democracy and institutional trust in the jurisdiction of the Finnish planner. Planning Theory & Practice, 18 (1), pp.71-88. DOI:

Reagans, Ray and Bill McEvily (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (2), pp.240-267. DOI:

Rowley, Timothy J. (1997) Moving beyond Dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4), pp.887-910. DOI:

Rydin, Yvonne (2007) Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6 (1), pp.52-68. DOI:

Rydin, Yvonne, Urooj Amjad and Martine Whitaker (2007) Environmentally sustainable construction: Knowledge and learning in London planning departments. Planning Theory & Practice, 8 (3), pp.363-380. DOI:

Senge, Peter (1990) The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.

Sengupta, Ulysses, Ward S. Rauws and Gert de Roo (2016) Planning and complexity: Engaging with temporal dynamics, uncertainty and complex adaptive systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43 (6), pp.970-974. DOI:

Siciliano, Michael D. (2016) Ignoring the experts: Networks and organizational learning in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27 (1), pp.104-119. DOI:

Soda, Giuseppe, Alessandro Usai and Akbar Zaheer (2004) Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6), pp.893-906. DOI:

Spender, John-Christopher (1996) Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: Three concepts in search of a theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9 (1), pp.63-78. DOI:

Stead, Dominic and Evert Meijers (2009) Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory & Practice, 10 (3), pp.317-332. DOI:

Symon, Gillian and Catherine Cassell (eds) (2013) Qualitative organizational research. Core methods and current challenges. London: Sage. DOI:

te Brömmelstroet, Marco and Luca Bertolini (2010) Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making. Transportation, 37 (1), pp.85-104. DOI:

Tennøy, Aud, Lisa Hansson, Enza Lissandrello and Petter Næss (2016) How planners’ use and non-use of expert knowledge in land use and transport planning affect the goal achievement potential of plans? Experiences from three Scandinavian cities. Progress in Planning, 109, pp.1-32. DOI:

Vigar, Geoff (2009) Towards an integrated spatial planning? European Planning Studies, 17 (11), pp.1571-1590. DOI:

Waddell, Paul (2011) Integrated land use and transportation planning and modelling: Addressing challenges in research and practice. Transport Reviews, 31 (2), pp.209-229. DOI:

Walsh, James P. and Gerardo Rivera Ungson (1991) Organizational memory. The Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), pp.57-91. DOI:

Wegner, Daniel M. (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Mullen, Brian and George R. Goethals (eds) Theories of Group Behavior. New York: Springer, pp.185-208. DOI:

Wasserman, Stanley and Katherine Faust (1994) Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Yigitcanlar, Tan and Suharto Teriman (2015) Rethinking sustainable urban development: Towards an integrated planning and development process. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12 (1), pp.341-352. DOI: