The example of the greater region
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2017.01.005Keywords:
Cross-border territorial strategy, cross-border governance, the Greater Region, obstacles, cross-border cooperationAbstract
Cross-border strategies have been flourishing over the last few decades in Europe, mostly in a favourable context where European funding is available and legal instruments are well-developed. However, one may wonder which objectives are really targeted within this very broad and imprecise notion of cross-border strategy. The purpose of this paper is, first, to provide a theoretical framework in order to better understand the different meanings of the notion of cross-border integration and to provide a more critical perspective on its effects. Secondly, it analyses the policy content of the cross-border territorial strategy developed within the Greater Region before, in the final section, pointing out the difficulties faced by policy-makers during its elaboration. This final section is based on the insights brought both by the regional stakeholders interviewed and by our expertise as moderators and scientific advisors within the working group in charge of the realisation of the cross-border territorial strategy. The main finding of our analysis is that the consensus that has been reached by all the stakeholders is the “smallest common denominator”; that is to say, the least constraining.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anderson, A. and Wever, E. (2003) Borders, border regions and economic integration: One world, ready or not, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 18 (1), pp.27-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2003.9695599
Bufon, M. (2011) Cross-border policies and spatial and social integration: Between challenges and problems, European Spatial Research and Policy, 18 (2), pp.29-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10105-011-0011-2
Cankar, S., Seljak, J. and Petkovšek, V. (2014) Factors that influence cross-border cooperation between businesses in the Alps–Adriatic region, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27, pp.304-319; doi:10.1080/1331677x.2014.952091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2014.952091
De Boe, P., Grasland, C. and Healy, A. (1999) Spatial integration. Study Programme on European Spatial Planning 14, Final Report. [Online] Available from: http://www.mcrit.com/SPESP/SPESP_REPORT/1.4.%20Final%20Report%20(23-05-2000).pdf [Accessed 2 January, 2017].
Decoville, A., Durand, F., Sohn, C. and Walther, O. (2013) Comparing cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: Towards a functional typology, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28 (2), pp.221-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2013.854654
Département des Transports, Luxembourg (2014) Scheme for cross-border mobility [Online] Available from: http://www. mt.public.lu/presse/actualite/2009/01/08_SMOT/ [Accessed 2 January, 2017].
De Vries, J. (2008) Breaking the deadlock: Lessons from cross-border spatial projects in Flanders and the Netherlands, disP - The Planning Review, 44 (172), pp.48-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557002
Dominguez, L. and Pires, I. (eds.) (2014) Cross-border cooperation structures in Europe. Learning from the past, looking to the future. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
Dörry, S. and Decoville, A. (2016) Governance and transportation policy networks in the cross-border metropolitan region of Luxembourg: A social network analysis, European Urban and Regional Studies, 23 (1), pp.69-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413490528
Dörry, S. and Walther, O. (2015) Contested ‘relational policy spaces’ in two European border regions, Environment and Planning A, 47, pp.338-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a130315p
Dühr, S., Colomb, C. and Nadin, V. (2010) European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895290
Dühr, S., Stead, D. and Zonneveld, W. (2007) The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation, Planning Practice & Research, 22 (3), pp.291-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701688245
Durand, F. (2015) Reflections on the production of cross-border spaces: The case study of the Eurometropolis of Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai, Journal of Borderland Studies, 30 (3), pp.309-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2015.1066701
Durand, F. (2014) Challenges of cross-border spatial planning in the metropolitan regions of Luxembourg and Lille, Planning Practice & Research, 29 (2), pp.113-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2014.896148
Durand, F. and Lamour, C. (2014) Cross-border metropolitan governance: The multi-faceted state power – The case study of the Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai, Space and Polity, 18 (3), pp.197-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2014.957041
European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON) (2010) METROBORDER: Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions, Final report, Luxembourg [Online] Available from: http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_ Projects/Menu_TargetedAnalyses/metroborder.html [Accessed 2 January, 2017].
European Commission (1999) ESDP – European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union. Luxembourg: European Communities.
European Commission (2008) Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion: Turning territorial diversity into strength. Brussels: European Communities.
European Union (2011) Agenda Territorial 2020 – Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Gödöllő: European Union.
Evrard, E. and Schultz, C. (2015) L’ambition métropolitaine: Clé vers un aménagement du territoire transfrontalier en Grande Région SaarLorLux? L’Information géographique, 79 (3), pp.54-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/lig.793.0054
Faludi, A. (2010) Cohesion, coherence, cooperation: European spatial planning coming of age? Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842324
Henrikson, A. K. (2010) Border regions as neighbourhoods. In Wastl-Walter, D. (ed.) The Ashgate research companion to border studies. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.85-102.
Jacobs, J. (2016) Spatial planning in cross-border regions: A systems theoretical perspective, Planning Theory, 15 (1), pp.69-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214547149
Korthals Altes, W. K. (2014) The Europeanization of development planning in Valencia, European Planning Studies, 22 (2), pp.418-436, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.757585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.757585
Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. (2009) Planning cultures in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.
Knippschild, R. (2011) Cross-border spatial planning: Understanding, designing and managing cooperation processes in the German-Polish-Czech borderland, European Planning Studies, 19 (4), pp.629-645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548464
La Cecla, F. (1997) Il malinteso: Antropologia dell’incontro. Rome: Laterza & Figli.
Nelles, J. and Durand, F. (2014) Political rescaling and metropolitan governance in cross-border regions: Comparing the cross-border metropolitan areas of Lille and Luxembourg, European Urban and Regional Studies, 21 (1), pp.104-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411431103
Newman, P. and Thornley, A. (1996) Urban planning in Europe: International competition, national systems and planning projects. London: Routledge.
Newman, D. (2006) The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our ‘borderless’ world, Progress in Human Geography, 30, pp.143-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
Nugent, P. (2012) Border towns and cities in comparative perspective: Barriers, flows and governance. In Wilson, T. and Donnan, H. (eds.) A companion to border studies (Blackwell companion to anthropology). Oxford: Blackwell, pp.557-572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118255223.ch32
Paasi, A. and Zimmerbauer, K. (2016) Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning, Environment and Planning A, 48 (1), pp.75-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15594805
Peña, S. (2007) Cross-border planning at the US-Mexico border: An institutional approach, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 22 (1), pp.1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2007.9695666
Perkmann, M. (1999) Building governance institutions across European borders, Regional Studies, 33 (7), pp.657-667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078693
Richardson, J. (2012) Supranational state building in the European Union. In Richardson, J. (ed.), Constructing a policy-making state? Policy dynamics in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.3-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604104.003.0001
Scott, J. (1999) European and North American contexts for cross-border regionalism, Regional Studies, 33 (7), pp.605-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078657
Sohn, C., Reitel, B. and Walther, O. (2009) Cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: The case of Luxembourg, Basel and Geneva, Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, pp.922-939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c0893r
STATEC (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg) (2014) Le Luxembourg en chiffres. Luxembourg: STATEC.
Terlouw, K. (2012) Border surfers and Euroregions: Unplanned cross-border behaviour and planned territorial structures of cross-border governance, Planning Practice and Research, 27 (3), pp.351-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.670939
Topaloglou, L., Kalliora, D., Manetos, P. and Petrakos, G. (2005) A border regions typology in the enlarged European Union, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 20 (2), pp.67-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2005.9695644
Van Houtum, H. (2000) An overview of European geographical research on borders and border regions, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 15 (1), pp.57-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2000.9695542
